« Hang the price: iPhone 3G sells out in NZ [UPDATE: analyst questions worldwide "sell out"] | Main | She's baaaa-aaaack »

When John O'Hara lost 18.5 hours' worth of email access during the YahooXtra Bubble upgrade fiasco, he was not content with the week of free internet offered as blanket panacea (which O'Hara valued at $15), he took Telecom to the Disputes Tribunal. And last night O'Hara emailed to confim the Tribunal had awarded him $1,000 in compensation for the time - personal time, not work time - that he lost trying to reestablish his connection to his Xtra mail account during the August 07 disruption.

O'Hara comments: " Like many others I suffered a tortuous and inept support process making many calls to technical support in Thailand in a fruitless attempt to regain what I had before the disastrous and disingenuously claimed 'upgrade'". Incidentally it was in fact the replacement of a system with a completely new system requiring new terms and conditions to be agreed to (without any warning) before being able to used rather than an 'upgrade!'"

Our amateur consumer champ also has advice for others wondering where to start: "The Consumer Guarantee Act requires companies to provide services that are fit for purpose, to act with reasonable care and skill and within a reasonable timeframe. Where they do not ample remedies are available." (Read the Act's definition of service failure, and your right to remedy, here.)

"I was able to clearly demonstrate Telecom had failed each of these requirements and so was successful in claiming compensation for my wasted time."

"The process of taking action is against a company is straightforward and inexpensive and can be done through your local Disputes Tribunal." Find out how at www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/disputes_tribunals.html

Go John!

O'Hara adds that at the hearing, Telecom staff made comments about not wanting to set a precedent. That's not something he has a problem with:

"I'm sure if they had to pay 100,000 people $1000 each they'd do a better job next time. And that's really the point of it. One good thing about the litigious nature of the US is that companies do tend to behave better because of the threat of legal class actions!"

Incidentally, if you're wondering if O'Hara seems more feisty than the average bear, he is. During the 1990s he set up Voyager, one of the country's first independent internet service providers, and certainly the first to get into a slug-fest with Telecom when it launched Xtra back in May 1996 - Voyager, and others, were already in the market at that point, competing for New Zealand's 35,000 internet users.

Comments

It may well be in Telecom's Ts & Cs, but no individual or company can legally contract out of law.

Isn't it in the telecom terms that telecom are not liable for consequential losses, and you use their service that your own risk. The users should have had a backup system. I think it is a bad decision, becuase it will end up putting up prices for everyone. I hope telecom appeal it as it could open up a can of worms if telecom aren't able to enforce their own terms.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Subscribe
Newsletter & SubscriptionsPC World is New Zealand’s top selling computing and technology magazine.

It provides up-to-the-minute editorial, insight and buying advice for personal computing, cell phones, game consoles, digital entertainment and broadband.
SIGN UP
PCWorldUpdate
PC World's fortnightly round-up of tech news, gear and game reviews, software selections, and handy How Tos.